Sports-Related Brain Injuries in Arizona High Schools: Can Schools Be Held Liable?
Blows to the head are an accepted risk in football, soccer, wrestling, and even cheerleading. You expect bruises and sore muscles. Yet traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) can lurk under the helmet without visible clues. When a student’s mood shifts or grades plummet weeks after a big game, parents often realize only too late that the hit was far from harmless.
The hidden danger of delayed brain injury symptoms
Brain injuries don’t always present immediately after a car crash or fall. Symptoms can take days or weeks to appear. The same is true on the playing field. A linebacker may jog off after a collision, only to wake days later with pounding headaches and blurred vision.
Because coaches see no instant knockout, they send the athlete back in, increasing the damage. Arizona’s concussion protocol requires removal from play when signs appear, yet delayed onset means many injuries go unnoticed until homework struggles or personality changes trigger a doctor visit.
By the time imaging reveals a micro‑bleed, the paper trail of negligence can feel cold.
Arizona’s concussion laws and school responsibilities
The state’s Youth Sports Concussion Law (A.R.S. §15‑341) mandates annual education for coaches, informed consent forms for parents, and medical clearance before return to play. Even with these safeguards, compliance varies widely across districts. Some programs fail to log baseline tests; others ignore minor symptoms to keep star players on the roster. Public schools owe a duty of ordinary care under common law. Breaching that duty—by skipping evaluations, ignoring symptoms, or using outdated helmets—opens the door to liability. When policies exist only on paper, a skilled brain injury lawyer can expose gaps that endanger students.
Proving negligence when diagnosis comes weeks later
Delayed diagnosis complicates the task of proving causation. Defense attorneys argue the concussion came from skateboarding or video games, not the Friday‑night tackle. Establishing a timeline is critical. Social‑media posts, practice videos, and witness statements help trace the exact moment of impact. Medical experts correlate symptom onset with known latency patterns of diffuse axonal injury. Neuropsychologists compare pre‑season baseline scores to post‑injury testing, thereby demonstrating cognitive decline linked to the game. A veteran brain injury lawyer weaves these threads into a compelling narrative.
The role of medical documentation and baseline testing
Baseline neurocognitive exams provide a snapshot of each athlete’s normal function. When schools neglect them, families lose a vital comparison tool, and judges see that omission as evidence of breach.
Immediate medical attention after any suspected head impact builds a chain of custody for symptoms. CT scans may look normal, but detailed notes on dizziness, photophobia, or sleep trouble corroborate later MRI findings. Keep injury diaries. They counter defense claims of fabricated complaints.
Common defense tactics schools use
School attorneys often claim signed permission slips waive all liability. Arizona courts reject waivers that attempt to excuse gross negligence. Another tactic is blaming the athlete’s failure to report symptoms. Coaches must still act on visible cues. Silence is not blanket consent to endanger a minor.
Steps parents should take after suspecting a concussion
Document every symptom in a daily journal—headaches, mood swings, or sensitivity to light or noise, for example. Patterns strengthen medical opinions on delayed onset. Request written copies of sideline evaluations, return‑to‑play forms, and helmet maintenance logs. These documents often reveal shortcuts. Notify the athletic director in writing within days of the impact. An early paper trail defeats future claims that the school learned of the problem too late to intervene.
The evolving science of chronic traumatic encephalopathy
Research links repetitive sub-concussive hits to chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), a degenerative brain disease discovered post‑mortem in athletes. Although CTE diagnosis requires autopsy, Arizona courts may allow expert testimony on its likelihood to explain long-term symptoms—if the expert meets evidentiary standards.
Sovereign immunity and claim procedures against public schools
Arizona’s Notice of Claim statute (A.R.S. §12‑821.01) gives public schools a measure of sovereign immunity. You must serve a written claim within 180 days of discovering the injury, and you must file a lawsuit within one year. Miss the deadline and your claim dies, no matter how egregious the negligence.
Private schools, club teams, and equipment manufacturers lack that shield. A concussion caused by a defective helmet inserts product‑liability principles alongside tort law. Experienced attorneys identify every possible defendant to preserve full compensation.
Damages recoverable for student‑athletes
A mild TBI can derail college dreams. Victims may need tutoring, counseling, or medication for years. Arizona courts allow recovery for medical bills, future treatment, lost earning capacity, and non‑economic damages like pain and suffering, anxiety, PTSD, and loss of life’s pleasures.
Punitive damages may be available when school staff act with conscious disregard for student safety—for example, knowingly violating concussion protocols despite clear risks. Email chains boasting about “toughening up” athletes show conscious disregard and motivate juries to send a message through high damages awards.
Why early legal help matters even when symptoms are late
Parents often hesitate to “make a fuss” until memory lapses or mood swings spiral. Waiting jeopardizes evidence. Surveillance videos are overwritten; helmets are reissued; coaches move on. Prompt consultation lets a brain injury lawyer send preservation letters, secure equipment, and schedule independent medical exams before memories fade. Legal counsel also coordinates neurologists and economists to quantify lifelong costs, ensuring settlement offers reflect the true burden of a hidden brain injury.
Choosing the right attorney for your child
Brain trauma cases blend law, medicine and psychology. Look for attorneys with courtroom victories in delayed‑onset concussion claims. Ask about trial readiness. Schools and insurers track which firms cave in to settlement before depositions. Ironically, a reputation for winning verdicts increases settlement value, sparing families a drawn‑out fight.
Plattner Verderame’s personal injury litigation team is prepared to take on Arizona school districts to protect the rights and futures of injured athletes. When hidden brain trauma upends your child’s future, let their proven advocates secure the medical care, tuition support, and accountability your family deserves.
I have been active in leadership in the Arizona Association for Justice (lawyers who represent injured folks, and formerly known as the Arizona Trial Lawyers Association) since 1985. I served as President in 1991. I was an active participant in battles to protect the Arizona Constitution from the insurance industry and big business interests in 1986, 1990 and 1994.
Read more about Richard Plattner